Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: 4.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: No rating
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: No rating
Tags:
Article rating: 4.7
Tags:
Article rating: 4.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: No rating
Tags:
Article rating: 3.5
Tags:
Article rating: 4.2
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
Article rating: 5.0
Tags:
RSS

A tale of two regimes - NDA vs. UPA

Author: Rajiv Singh/Wednesday, March 20, 2019/Categories: Exclusive

A tale of two regimes - NDA vs. UPA

As elections draw closer, comparisons of the economic records of political parties become natural. After independence, India adopted a planned economy with significant state control; as a result, despite strong growth potential, India lagged behind most of its Asian peers and thus disappointed many.

It took a crisis, namely the Balance of Payments of the early 90s for India to change course. The government led by P V Narasimha Rao with Manmohan Singh as the Finance Minister started the process of economic liberalization. In 1997 in the “dream budget”, Finance Minister P. Chidambaram introduced capital account convertibility.

However, despite these efforts, growth didn’t improve significantly. Indeed, when the A B Vajpayee led NDA took charge, the Indian economy faced challenges on account of high NPAs, rising fiscal deficit, and the Asian financial crisis. But the government didn’t waste the crisis and carried out significant reforms by enacting the SARFESI Act, FRBM Act and opened up many sectors to the private players.

  NDA-1(1999-2004) UPA-1(2004-2009 UPA-2(2009 - 2014) NDA-2(2014- 2019)
GDP Growth in % 5.82 8.04 7.46 7.20
Inflation in % 4.12 5.78 10.40 4.47
FDI Net Billion USD -3.13 -9.31 -19.33 -31.92
FDI Net Inflows Billion USD 3.95 20.27 30.33 40.75
Exports % of GDP 13.38 20.96 23.52 20.28
Current Account Deficit/Surplus as % of GDP 0.29 -1.09 -3.27 -1.10

 

By the time NDA left office, growth had increased to 7.9% on account of the cumulative impact of reforms since 1991.  On top of this, China’s entry in the WTO and benign global liquidity conditions led to a pickup in global growth.

During the first five years of the Manmohan Singh government, India grew at 8.34% per year. Strong global growth helped as well, according to World Bank data, the global economy grew by 3.7% between 2004 and 2008, whereas during the Vajpayee era, the global economy had grown at 2.86% per year. Unfortunately, the UPA government was unable to take advantage of the good times and the momentum of economic reforms halted.

The populist tendencies of Manmohan Singh led UPA 1 government soon caught up and fiscal deficit rose to 5.99% in 2008-09 from an average of 3.61% during 2003-2008. While some of the increase was on account of the stimulus to counter the impact of the global financial crisis, some of this spending was on unproductive populist schemes.

When UPA 2 was formed, expectations for reforms were high, as the left oriented parties were not a part of the coalition, but soon disappointment set in. Due to continuing high fiscal deficit, Consumer Price Inflation was high, averaging 10.4% during UPA 2. Not only this, the investment climate deteriorated as well and the introduction of retrospective taxation was not received well. Also due to the policy paralysis, investments declined, leading to accumulation of stressed assets in the banking system. During 2012 and 2013, rating agencies warned of a possible downgrade to India’s credit rating. The crisis of the time can be summed up by the fact that India was regarded as part of the “fragile five” during the taper tantrum of 2013.

Since the last crisis during the time of the taper tantrum, the Indian economy has made significant progress in achieving macro stability. In November 2013, Consumer Price Inflation was 11.5% vs. 2.57% now. Similarly, current account deficit was 5.1% of GDP in Oct-Dec 2012 vs. 2.33% of GDP in the last quarter. Fiscal deficit which was 4.6% of GDP in FY2013-14 has been reduced to 3.4% of GDP in FY 2018-19.

The government has carried out a number of structural reforms including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy code (IBC), implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act leading to establishment of Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) in states. Lastly, the problem of stressed assets has been tackled and with recapitalization, the banking sector is now in a position to support growth. GDP growth has been good at 7.2% in the four years of the NDA regime.

These reforms have held back growth in the short term but will be beneficial in the long term no matter who assumes power in May 2019. Encouragingly, the outlook for investment spending has picked up; growth in fixed capital formation remains strong at 10.6% for Q3FY2018-19. The driver of growth is now shifting to capex spending. Change in driver of growth is welcome as capacity addition, especially in areas of infrastructure is crucial for creating employment opportunities in the future and realize India’s demographic dividend.

The author is CEO, Karvy Stock Broking

Print Rate this article:
4.2

Number of views (2692)/Comments (25)

25 comments on article "A tale of two regimes - NDA vs. UPA"

Shivika

3/20/2019 5:14 PM

Informative article


Genia

3/20/2019 5:15 PM

Quite informative


Priyanka

3/20/2019 5:17 PM

Very informative article.


Kanchan Upreti

3/20/2019 5:18 PM

Very Informative article


Bijay kumar chaudhay

3/20/2019 5:18 PM

Far better than other government as comparison to previous government .Hope to see once again.


Kishore

3/20/2019 5:20 PM

Was informative


Remo

3/20/2019 5:20 PM

Good one


Nagaraj L k

3/20/2019 5:22 PM

Useful msg


Keerthana Vijayaraj

3/20/2019 5:22 PM

Very informative


Rekha Singh

3/20/2019 5:34 PM

Very nice insight into the economic condition during both the regimes


ayushi upadhyay

3/20/2019 5:37 PM

nicely researched


Akhil kumar kaundle

3/20/2019 5:37 PM

good article


Prateek Saraswat

3/20/2019 5:38 PM

nice article


Nutan Rana

3/20/2019 5:39 PM

Nice article.


isha behl

3/20/2019 5:40 PM

Excellent


Paras jain

3/20/2019 5:41 PM

yes the article is good becuase the GDP growth is cosistingly upgrading


Mahendar

3/20/2019 5:41 PM

Nice One


sujeet sharma

3/20/2019 5:42 PM

we want honest government.


deecha katiyar

3/20/2019 5:45 PM

knowledge based article


Shweta kushwah

3/20/2019 5:45 PM

need honest party


vaibhav.os

3/20/2019 5:49 PM

Good article


Deepak M

3/20/2019 5:52 PM

Good article


NIDHIN

3/20/2019 5:57 PM

Good article


Chetana

3/20/2019 6:00 PM

Good article for reference. Understanding the election campaign


Hemant Kumar Saini

3/20/2019 6:19 PM

nice article

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Videos

Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
 
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
 
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above

Finapolis Quiz

Which company derives its name from the words ‘Industrial Oxygen’?

 INOX 

 PVR

CINEPOLIS

Finapolis Poll

Did Union Budget 2019 presented by Nirmala Sitharaman meet your expectations?

Yes No Can't Say

Please answer this simple math question

3+2 =
Want to Invest
 
 

Categories

Disclaimer

The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free