Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.8
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: 3.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.5
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.2
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating


Taxman’s watching! Don’t act smart on that deduction claim

Author: Arvind Rao/Monday, May 29, 2017/Categories: Tax, Save

Taxman’s watching! Don’t act smart on that deduction claim

There is tax planning and then there is oversimplified tax planning. Some of the most common tax deductions and exemptions provided under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act) have been interpreted and oversimplified by taxpayers to their convenience. Such interpretations have often been the matter of litigation with the Tax Department and further at various appellate authorities such as tribunals and courts. Let us see some such oversimplified deductions and exemptions to understand the consequences thereof.

House Rent Allowance

A recent judgement by the Mumbai Tax Tribunal (Meena Vaswani v. ACIT) in relation to the exemption claimed for the House Rent Allowance (HRA) has revealed certain laxities on part of taxpayers. In the said case, the taxpayer was a Chartered Accountant working in a company, married to a Chartered Accountant and having a daughter. The taxpayer owned a house property and claimed the interest benefit available for self-occupied houses under the applicable section of the Act. In addition to this, she also claimed exemption for the HRA paid to her as a part of her salary. For this exemption, she claimed that she paid rent (in cash) to her mother who stayed in a separate flat, which was located close to the taxpayer’s flat. The taxpayer substantiated her claim by way of rent receipts duly signed by her mother.


However, the tax officer argued that there was no rent agreement available to back the taxpayer’s claim for exemption and further relied on the department’s field-investigation which revealed that the taxpayer was in fact staying in her own apartment while her other sister was staying along with their mother in her the flat nearby. In its decision, the Tribunal observed that the taxpayer could not produce any evidence such as a leave and license agreement, letter to society intimating about her tenancy, rent payments through bank, cash payments backed with known sources, electricity bill payments through cheque, water bill payments through cheque, or other correspondence during the period of alleged tenancy to prove she had indeed hired her mother’s premises on rent during the year. Further, documents such as the ration card, bank statements, tax returns filed, along with the fact that an Indian married woman normally lives with her husband in a jointly owned residential flat, pointed strongly towards the fact that the taxpayer had in fact not stayed on rent.

All of the above along with the fact that the taxpayer’s mother did not file her returns for any of the periods and the said rental income was not brought to tax in the hands of the mother did not help the taxpayer’s cause. Giving due weightage to all of the above factors, the case was finally decided against the taxpayer. Basis the above judgement, taxpayers need to note that HRA exemption is available only for those (actually) paying rentals for their accommodation on an arm’s length basis. All elements that usually form part of a lease agreement need to be in place to prove the genuineness of the transaction, without which the Department may see the deduction claimed in bad colour.

Leave Travel Concession

Abolition of the standard deduction for salaried taxpayers a few years back meant fewer avenues of tax-exemption and savings. Besides the HRA, leave travel concession/ allowance (LTA/LTC) is yet another exemption for taxpayers who go on exemptions in respect of money spent for their domestic vacations.

Typically, companies insist that the declarations by employees should be backed-up by the air /rail tickets for self and family (members) travelling together. In many cases, boarding passes in original need to be submitted along with air tickets. Thus, it was interpreted that the exemption , thus puts the onus of verification of expenses on the employer. In 2009, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Larsen & Toubro, held that employers while assessing the LTC claims of employees, are under no obligation to collect and check supporting evidence and furnish them to the Tax Department.

Exemption against donations u/s 80G

Income tax returns forms over the past 2 years have made it mandatory for incorporating basic details like the donee institution’s name, address and PAN in respect of claim for donations made u/s 80G. Taxpayers who make donations will be required to obtain the receipt for the same and verify if the donations qualify for the said deduction. It is not mandatory that every donation is tax deductible. In the absence of a valid receipt, the taxpayer may be deprived of the tax benefit.

What does the future hold?

Both the above judgements, although in relation to different exemptions under the Act, in the writer’s opinion point towards an emerging trend in relation to stringent verification of tax exemptions availed by salaried taxpayers. In the case of HRA and LTC, the first-level of verification and assessment is done by the employer and the necessary exemption and taxability are accordingly stated in the employee’s Form 16.

Tax officers are slowly and steadily looking to independently verify exemption claims as given in the Form-16 during the course of assessments of salaried taxpayers. For this purpose, salaried taxpayers will be asked to reproduce all / any of the documents that were first submitted/ declared by them to their respective employers in support of their exemption claim.

As observed in Meena Vaswani’s case, the tax officer actually instituted an inquiry by his Inspector to verify the ground realities and record statements of the society secretary, watchman and neighbours to validate the claim made by the taxpayer regarding her place of stay. Borrowing from this case, tax officers may initiate inquiry reports from the airlines / railways regarding verification of traveller’s data as per documents submitted by employees at the time of claim. Records in relation to stay at hotels / resorts supporting the travel details may also be sought. Road trips could also be easily subject matter of deeper investigation by the tax officer.

During the course of tax assessments currently undertaken for salaried taxpayers, tax officers regularly demand independent verification of documents for deductions claimed under section 80C and 80D of the Act. Although these documents are regularly filed by employees with their respective companies during January-March, there is nothing stopping the tax officer from re-investigating them.

The above trend can be easily extended for various other exemptions including but not limited to medical reimbursements, petrol bills, conveyance reimbursements, driver salaries, telephone bills, etc.

Judgements like that of Meena Vaswani serve as a wake-up call for taxpayers to get their claim documentation and records straight. Corporate taxpayers are already attuned to regular scrutiny of their accounts by the taxman. As India moves closer to a more stringent tax regime, its time salaried taxpayers too brace themselves for a stricter verification. 

(The author is proprietor at Arvind Rao & Associates, a Mumbai-based Chartered Accountancy firm)

Print Rate this article:

Number of views (1096)/Comments (0)

Administrator Account

Arvind Rao

Other posts by Arvind Rao
Contact author

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free