Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: 4.2
Article rating: 4.8
Article rating: 4.3
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 3.0


’IRDAI missed early warning signals at Sahara India Life’

Author: IANS/Tuesday, August 1, 2017/Categories: Regulatory

’IRDAI missed early warning signals at Sahara India Life’

Chennai, Aug 1 - The Indian insurance regulatory authority seems to have clearly missed or misread the early warning signals of the happenings in private life insurer Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd, senior industry officials said.

A cursory reading of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority's (IRDAI) order against Sahara India Life in 2012 shows the regulator has clearly missed the wood for the trees, officials said on condition of anonymity.

The regulator had fined Sahara India Life Rs 12 lakh for various violations observed during an onsite inspection in 2010 -- some of the them pertaining to corporate governance issue, industry officials said.

An onsite inspection -- nearly six years after Sahara India Life was licenced to operate -- observed that it was not functioning as an independent accounting and legal entity.

Officials of group companies were authorising payments for the life insurer. Stationery of group companies was being used.

The regulator had termed these violations of prudent accounting norms.

However, the IRDAI did not press the charges further as it was satisfied with the life insurer's explanation that also confirmed that Sahara India Life's officers themselves were verifying/passing bills.

"Taking into account the fact that overall expenses are also within the limit of Rule 170 of Insurance Rule, 1939 charge is not pressed. However, the insurer be cautioned to stop all these practices and confirm the same," then IRDAI Chairman J. Hari Narayan ordered on Feb 27, 2012.

Interestingly, payment of rent to group companies by Sahara India Life was also considered and approved by IRDAI in 2012 itself.

The insurance regulator had observed that rent payment to group companies was without formal agreements.

However, the IRDAI in its order said it was not pressing the charge as Sahara India Life had submitted all rent agreements along with compliance to inspection observation.

The insurance regulator was satisfied with the explanation given by Sahara India Life on observations pertaining to the payments made to Sahara group companies.

The regulatory had then penalised Sahara India Life for issues like delays in claim settlements.

But in its July 28 order, the IRDAI had concluded that the promoters of Sahara India Life are no more fit and proper and a sum of Rs 78 crore has already been siphoned off in the name of security deposits.

Refuting the charge, Sahara India Life in a statement on Sunday said: "In fact this amount was kept as security deposit to one entity -- Sahara India -- who has provided furnished, computerised office accommodation at around 150 places."

According to the group, this arrangement is very beneficial for Sahara India Life while IRDAI concluded otherwise.

"This security deposit amount is absolutely repayable to Sahara Life," the statement said.

The IRDAI on July 28 had ordered transfer of Sahara India Life's business portfolio to ICICI Prudential Life Insurance effective from July 31 (Monday).

Last month, the IRDAI had appointed its own official as an administrator of Sahara India Life. The administrator had initially ordered Sahara India Life to stop accepting new business.

The IRDAI had ordered transfer of Sahara India Life's insurance business to ICICI Prudential Life based on the administrator's report.

Aggrieved by IRDAI's order, Sahara India Life had approached the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). The SAT on Monday ordered maintenance of status quo till it hears the case on August 7.

According to industry officials, the regulator should have exercised additional control over Sahara India Life in 2015 itself after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) ordered cancellation of certificate of registration of Sahara Mutual Fund as it found the fund house, Sahara Asset Management Company (AMC) and Sahara Sponsor, not "fit and proper" to carry on the business.

Ordering the transfer of life insurance business to ICICI Prudential Life, the IRDAI has not considered the fate of Sahara India Life's employees or its agents, industry officials added.

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (273)/Comments (0)

S Vijaykrishnan
S Vijaykrishnan


Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free