Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: 4.2
Article rating: 4.8
Article rating: 4.3
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 3.0


Govt’s claims of savings through Aadhaar baseless, SC told

Author: IANS/Thursday, March 15, 2018/Categories: Government

Govt’s claims of savings through Aadhaar baseless, SC told

New Delhi - The Supreme Court was told that the government's claims of saving by plugging leakage by linking disbursal of rations under the Public Distribution System and LPG with Aadhaar was "incorrect and inflated" as there was no study to back such a claim.

Telling the five judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra that there was not a single study to demonstrate that "identity fraud" is a large proportion of corruption in the implementation of welfare system, senior counsel K.V.Viswanathan said claims of savings were "incorrect and inflated".

Asserting that there was evidence that "quantity fraud is pervasive", he told the bench also comprising Justice A.K. Sikri, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Ashok Bhushan that the government claim of saving, inter alia of Rs 14,000 crore in the PDS system, "due to the detection of 2.33 crore ration cards is incorrect, inflated and based on wrong assumption..."

Appearing for social activists Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Nachiket Udupa, Vishwanathan said that the government does not have the estimates of the leakage in PDS and also no study has been carried out to ascertain if POS machines were effective in removing irregularities.

Telling the constitution bench that government was conflating the issue of "bogus/ineligible ration cards" with identity fraud, he said that "a large number of these 2.33 crore cards were deleted even before Aadhaar-integration and seeding came into effect".

Referring to the figures of decline in the leakage in PDS system even before it was linked to Aadhaar, Viswanathan held that "the state has failed to demonstrate that increased savings and better targeting are of an order of magnitude that justifies" the serious infringement of fundamental right to privacy of the citizens. 

Assailing the report of the UIDAI on the saving through Direct Benefit Transfer to the user of LPG which claims to have saved Rs 14,672 core in 2014-2015, Rs 6,912 crore in 2015-2016 and Rs 4,9824 crore in 2016-2017, he said that the report of the committee of secretaries headed by Cabinet Secretary had said that the "de-duplication of beneficiaries using Aadhaar was able to identify only 9 lakh duplicate connections, and the total saving in the annual subsidy was only Rs 91 crore".

The court was told this in the course of the hearing of a batch of petitions by former Karnataka High Court Judge K.S. Puttuswamy, Magsaysay awardee Shanta Sinha, feminist researcher Kalyani Sen Menon and others challenging the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme on the touchstone of the fundamental right to privacy.

Viswanathan will continue his arguments on Thursday.

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (208)/Comments (0)

rajyashree guha


Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free