Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: 3.4
Article rating: 3.0
Article rating: 2.0
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 4.5
Article rating: 4.3
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating


Time for Modi’s version of New Deal?

Author: IANS/Friday, August 11, 2017/Categories: Economy

Time for Modi’s version of New Deal?

By Amit Kapoor 

The RBI expectedly cut the repo rate last week by 25 basis points, bringing the key lending rate to a six-year low of 6%. This came in the backdrop of a steep fall in inflation and weak consumer demand across the country. However, even though the industry had long demanded the cut, it is unlikely to do much to revive investment activity across the country as the root cause for the problem does not lie in high interest rates.

The twin balance sheet problem of high corporate debts and rising non-performing assets (NPAs) with banks has been impeding fresh corporate investments. Both borrowing and lending activities have been affected due to this long-standing problem. As of March 2017, India's corporate debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 55% of the GDP, which is one of the highest among the emerging economies. Moreover, a recent IMF report points out that nearly a fifth of the corporate debt is held by companies that are not making profit. In such a scenario, firms will remain conservative and avoid borrowing more funds as long as their debts remain at unmanageable levels.

Another reason for corporates to avoid making fresh borrowings is their level of capacity utilisation -- the extent to which their productive capacity is being utilised. Fresh investments usually accrue when the capacity utilisation crosses the 80% mark. However, the level of capacity utilisation for Indian corporates is at historically low levels of 70-72%. Thus, fresh borrowings either for capacity expansion or newer projects seem unlikely in the near future. This will limit the effectiveness of monetary policy pursued by the RBI as low borrowing costs will not entice them to borrow fresh funds.

Further, the high levels of corporate debts are saddling banks with a rising pile of NPAs on their books. This is making banks risk-averse as a result and, hence, warier of lending to corporates. Bank credit to the commercial sector has fallen below to 38% in FY 2017, down from 50% a year ago. On the other hand, the bond market is booming with investment bankers arranging nearly Rs. 1.04 lakh crore ($16 billion) in the April to June quarter of this year -- the highest ever volume in the first quarter. This behaviour points to the fact that Indian corporates are tapping more into the corporate bond market and taking the external commercial borrowing route for their financial needs instead of relying on banks. Hence, transmission of interest rates will always be an issue.

Thus, under the given situation, monetary policy can only do so much to remedy the current economic scenario which is in doldrums. Both the savings rate and the investment rate in the country -- the two major drivers of growth -- have consistently fallen in the absence of strong domestic or global demand. The savings rate (ratio of gross saving to GDP) has fallen from 33.1% in 2014-15 to 32.3 per cent in 2015-16 while the investment rate (ratio of gross capital investment to GDP) has declined to 27.9%, from a peak of 37% in 2007. As a result, the index of industrial production (IIP) has plummeted to 0.4% in June of 2017 from a robust 7 per cent a year ago. Coal and cement production, which are the foremost indicators of industrial activity in the country, have contracted by 6.7% and 5.8%, respectively in June.

Such a welter of worrying trends -- including reduced GDP growth, tepid exports and low credit growth -- make a strong case for the need to employ policy tools apart from monetary ones. Perhaps, it is time the government partly gives up the strict fiscal discipline that it has been following. It is necessary to question the extent to which fiscal restraint should be practiced. In times of low inflation and uncertain output gains, the nominal GDP is bound to fall. Maintaining low levels of fiscal deficit in such an economy can hardly be appreciated.

In fact, the government has enough fiscal space to loosen its purse strings. It can push the fiscal deficit target from 3.2% of GDP to 3.5% for 2017-18 without violating the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act. Also, the tax revenues for the government has seen an upward trend of late. The central tax revenue has risen by 36.2% and non-tax by 4.1% in the first two months of this fiscal as compared to the same period last year.

However, while pursuing expansionary policies, fiscal authorities need to do more than just indulge in higher public expenditure. They should pursue institutional policies that can stimulate demand on a sustained basis. Therefore, fiscal expenditure in sectors that can generate the maximum amount of jobs would be the most effective course of action. It just might be time for Modi's version of the New Deal!

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (432)/Comments (0)

S Vijaykrishnan
S Vijaykrishnan


Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free