Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 3.7
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 4.5
Article rating: 3.8
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
RSS

News

GST may not raise revenues ’significantly’ in next few years: Fitch Ratings

Author: IANS/Tuesday, May 23, 2017/Categories: TRACKING THE GST

GST may not raise revenues ’significantly’ in next few years: Fitch Ratings

New Delhi, May 23 (IANS) The Goods and Services Tax (GST) reform, being touted as India's biggest reform that will come into effect from July 1, may not boost revenues "significantly" in the next few years, but can work in the medium term, said global rating agency Fitch Ratings.

 
 
 "We do not expect it will lead to significantly higher government revenues in the coming few years," Thomas Rookmaaker, Director, Sovereigns and Supranationals Group, Fitch Ratings, told IANS.
 
 He, however, pointed out that it may indirectly boost revenues in the medium term through higher GDP growth and more transparency.
 
 Acknowledging GST as "an important reform being implemented", Rookmaaker said it will facilitate trade within India and reduce transaction costs.
 
 Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia also had said earlier that the tax buoyancy under GST is likely to take a hit immediately.
 
 Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had also said that the revenues under GST may see an indirect increase with the widening of the tax net and less tax evasion.
 
 Along with GST, Fitch Ratings has recognised demonetisation as a "bold step aimed at curbing the use of black money" and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Aadhaar, Make in India, FDI-related measures and labour market laws as other strong reforms.
 
 It, however, noted that Indian governance standards were still weak as far as voice and accountability, government effectiveness, rule of law and control of corruption were concerned.
 
 "The minister explicitly recognised the low number of direct taxpayers in his Budget speech, stating that India is 'largely a tax non-compliant society'," Rookmaaker told IANS.
 
 "The (Indian) government has been consistently rolling out its ambitious reform agenda for some three years now. We believe it will remain committed to reforms in the coming years as well. In its latest Budget, the government hinted at further reforms to support foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and to simplify labour laws.
 
 "Reform implementation implies a gradual improvement in the business environment, but it is important to highlight that these improvements start from a low base," he said.
 
 Despite the Finance Ministry interactions with the Fitch Rating officials to convince them of India's reforms, the global agency has maintained the BBB rating for India, which remains unchanged since 2006.
 
 The Indian government, including Economic Affairs Secretary Shaktikanta Das and Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian, at various forums have questioned the rating agencies' methodology of not giving an upgrade to India despite significant improvements and reforms. 
 
 "Some significant improvements have taken place in India in recent years, such as on the monetary front, but there are some other factors constraining India's rating, including the high general government debt burden," Rookmaaker told IANS.
 
 Explaining the rating review process, he said the agency compares sovereigns like India to its peers on the basis of a large number of indicators. 
 
 "On the basis of some metrics India's credit profile looks relatively strong, while on others it is relatively weak. India's position in the World Bank ranking for Ease of Doing Business (EDB) illustrates how weak the business environment still is compared with peer countries," he said.
 
 India's EDB ranking is the lowest of all countries rated in the BBB category (like Indonesia, Morocco, Russia, Philippines). 
 
 Elucidating that weak public finances continue to constrain India's ratings, he said the recommendations made by the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) committee to bring down the fiscal deficit are still just recommendations and wondered to what extent the government would be committed to bring down the debt burden.
 
 "The FRBM committee has come up with some thoughtful recommendations which, if implemented, could significantly alter the fiscal parameters in the medium term. From a rating perspective, especially the focus on structurally bringing down the government debt burden is interesting. So far these are just committee recommendations, however, and it is unclear what the government will do with the recommendations and to what extent it will be committed to reducing the debt burden," he said.
 
 "The general government debt burden of 67.9 per cent of GDP is high compared with the 'BBB' median of 40.9 per cent. There is some consolidation at the Centre, but after including the states, which we do for all countries for comparability, the fiscal balance is still wide at 6.6 per cent of GDP ('BBB' median: -2.7 per cent), as estimated by Fitch for 2016-17," he added.
 

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (186)/Comments (0)

S Vijaykrishnan
S Vijaykrishnan

IANS

Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Videos

Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
 
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
 
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest
 
 

Categories

Disclaimer

The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free