Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 3.8
Article rating: 2.9
Article rating: 2.3
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
RSS

News

On a long way home, IBC revisits realty rules

Author: Kumar Shankar Roy/Wednesday, June 13, 2018/Categories: Real Estate, Expert View

On a long way home, IBC revisits realty rules

There is good news for home buyers who had the misfortune of buying flats from real estate firms who went kaput. With President Ram Nath Kovind approving the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Ordinance, 2018, home buyers are now on a par with other financial creditors of a bankrupt realty firm. With thousands of such home buyers till now facing uncertainty about the fate of their invested money in homes, they are hapless no more.

The amendment clearly allows home buyers to be treated as secured “financial creditors” for the insolvency process. This means the home buyers' total investments are reflected in the sum which can be recovered from the sale of assets of the bankrupt firm or company.

The process is pretty easy. Home buyers can now invoke Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, against such errant developers. This is exactly what banks do.

Also, such home buyers will be represented in the Committee of Creditors. This is an important step because it allows for a representative. Earlier, home buyers were treated as an unsecured creditor. This was of not much use because that graded their investment as an unsecured loan. By definition, an unsecured loan ranks quite low on the credit hierarchy and is given importance only after the bankers and other secured lenders have recovered their money.

With the window now open for being a secured financial creditor, nobody can touch the property of the home buyers. Earlier, once a realty firm went bankrupt, the flats for which home buyers had given money would become the property of banks. This sometimes resulted in these homes being open to auction them, even though they were actually investments borne out of the hard-earned money by common people.

The amended IBC does not clearly specify if homebuyers are to be treated as secured or unsecured financial creditors. Some believe the homebuyer will have to prove which category of creditor he/she is qualified to be after looking at the agreement with the real estate company. It is expected that over the next 2-4 weeks, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India will frame the detailed mechanism of representation of the homebuyers on the committee of creditors, and also give clarity on the secured/unsecured status of homebuyers.

Now, disgruntled home buyers have a status in case their real estate development company goes bankrupt. It is estimated that there are a huge number of home buyers facing difficulties due to delayed and incomplete real estate projects. A large portion of them is also quite complicated case types, as a number of realty firms have come under insolvency proceedings. 

Do remember that the home buyer used to be the worst sufferer. As banks only give 80 per cent of home purchase price as a loan, the home buyers in most cases invest all or a significant part of savings with the developer. Then, they are also paying EMIs on the loans taken. Plus, with homes usually getting delivered 36-48 months later, the home buyer also pays rent of the currently occupied property. 

With the new law, the home buyer gets a voting right. The home buyer can influence the resolution process in a way that their interests are safeguarded in the same way as banks. 

On May 23, the Union cabinet had taken the ordinance route to give home buyers benefits similar to banks and institutional creditors if the realty firm undergoes bankruptcy proceedings. 

Some analysts had earlier pointed out that by not treating home buyers as financial creditors, the IBC and RERA Act were taking opposite positions in case a real-estate firm goes kaput.

In the present scenario within the real estate sector, it is developers, rather than home buyers, who default on payments. Competition among developers led to massive accumulation of land. More money was required to build up land banks. Borrowing money for this purpose happened. Land development meant that the interest burden accumulated by developers was extremely huge. In many cases, the interest burden was much more than what could be met by the development and marketing of home properties and commercial floor space. So, real estate developers had to stop servicing debt and have now become part of the country’s Rs 10-lakh crore bad loan problem.

The author is a financial journalist with 13 years of experience

Print Rate this article:
1.5

Number of views (582)/Comments (0)

Kumar Shankar Roy
Kumar Shankar  Roy

Kumar Shankar Roy

Other posts by Kumar Shankar Roy
Contact author

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Videos

Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
 
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
 
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest
 
 

Categories

Disclaimer

The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free