Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 5.0
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: 3.8
Article rating: 2.9
Article rating: 2.3
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: 4.0
Article rating: No rating


More equalising paradigm of Indian growth story vitally required

Author: IANS/Tuesday, February 6, 2018/Categories: Global

More equalising paradigm of Indian growth story vitally required

By Amit Kapoor 

About 82% of the growth in global wealth accrued to the world's top one per cent over the last year while the bottom 50% saw no increase at all. This one per cent of the population continues to own more than the rest of humanity combined. These ominous findings emerge from the Oxfam report on world inequality released recently. Such statistics have been making news of late, but the problem has always seemed West-centric in nature.

However, the World Inequality Report 2018 puts India at centre stage. According to the report, the top 10% in India account for 55% of the national income, which is exceeded only by the Middle East (61%). The US (47%), China (41%) and Europe (37%) turn out to be more equal than India. Moreover, between 1990 and 2016, inequality has risen the fastest in India. Greater segmentation of the population reveals that the top 0.1% earners in India have captured more income growth than the bottom 50% of the population combined.

It is also worth pointing out that the rising Indian middle class is also a myth. A paper by Lucas Chancel and Thomas Piketty published in 2017 showed that the share of income going to the mid-40 percent of India's income earners fell from 46% in the 1980s to 30% in 2010. In fact, this segment of the Indian population mirrors the combined population of Bangladesh and Pakistan. On the contrary, the top one per cent roughly equates to Hong Kong in terms of population and average income. Thus, the prevalence of inequality is a vivid reality in India.

If the problem is as grievous in nature as the statistics reveal, why is the level of public discourse around it so minimal?

German-born Albert O. Hirschman might have provided an answer to that. He pointed out that the public perception on equality depends on the growth of an economy. When an economy is stagnant, it creates a zero-sum game where economic growth of a segment of the population can only occur at the cost of others. It, therefore, creates negative signalling effects of a possible deterioration in one's own standard of living.

On the contrary, in an economy with rapid economic growth, a positive-sum game is created where economic advancement of others creates a signalling effect where there is hope for rise in one's own well-being in the future. These expectations overcome any generation of envy and discontentment and, thus, makes the society tolerant towards rising levels of disparity. Therefore, India's fastest-growing economy tag explains why its citizens are nonchalant about the burgeoning levels of inequality in the society.

This also tells us that current policies should keep the rising trend of inequality in mind so as to not accentuate the problem, especially as discord and discontentment will reign supreme when growth falters or reaches its limits. For instance, India and its policymakers are usually quite keen to embrace the world economy -- from reducing trade restrictions to attracting foreign direct investment. While pursuing such policies might seem quite straightforward, it needs to be kept in mind that globalisation has been a slippery slope for world economies. It has created clear winners and losers in the West and might have the same inequitable effects on the Indian economy.

India's best bet to share the fruits of development more equitably across society is to proactively develop its labour market. There needs to be a concrete plan to create well-paying jobs for the bottom 50% of the population that is fast losing its income share. China managed to grow at the fastest pace in world history and remain more equitable than Indian society because it became the manufacturing hub of the world and could provide large-scale employment to all sections of society. India needs to somehow bring about a similar manufacturing revolution.

Moreover, the Oxfam report points out that non-compliance with minimum wage laws is also a huge problem in India. As a matter of fact, at least one in every two workers in the Indian garment industry is paid below the minimum wage. Therefore, higher creation of jobs needs to be complemented with a higher compliance of wage laws.

A reduction in gender disparity in the workforce can also tackle rising inequality to an extent. A 2016 McKinsey report noted that women contribute only 17% of India's GDP. The economy can, therefore, make extensive gains by tapping into this segment of the population, especially in the rural sector.

There are numerous ways that can render a more equalising growth paradigm of the Indian growth story, but time is of the essence. If India continues down along the same path, more and more people will be defined by their inheritances rather than their merit. In such a scenario, Hirschman's positive signalling will break down, along with the hope of bettering one's well-being through just means. It is an eventuality that India could well avoid.

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (150)/Comments (0)

rajyashree guha


Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free