Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
RSS

News

Aadhaar data is fully safe, assures UIDAI

Author: IANS/Friday, March 23, 2018/Categories: Government

Aadhaar data is fully safe, assures UIDAI

New Delhi, March 22 - The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) on March 22 told the Supreme Court that the biometric and demographic information of people who have enrolled for Aadhaar was secure, while no one will suffer loss of benefits for its lack.

In a first-ever power point presentation in the open court, the constitution bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, and Justice A.K. Sikri, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Ashok Bhushan was told that the data in encrypted form was "very very secure".

UIDAI CEO Ajay Bhushan Pandey said they start collecting data from the birth of a child which is twice updated at the age of five and later at 15 years and that 1.2 billion people have already enrolled.

He also said that a number once given to an enrolled person would not be repeated even after their death.

Pointing to the "exception handling mechanism" in the UIDAI system, Pandey said that "no one will suffer the loss of benefits for the lack of Aadhaar" as the bench pointed to illiterate, the poor and tribals who may not be aware that over time their biometrics have undergone changes and must be updated.

In the post-lunch presentation that lasted for an hour and a half, he said that every five years, there may be changes in the biometrics and that they are updating information of 25 crore Aadhaar holders annually.

However, the CEO said UIDAI could not handle every problem as Justice Sikri asked him what happens if a person goes to a ration shop and even though his biometric details match, he is refused goods which are later drawn by the shop owner in an unauthorised manner.

"It has to be handled at a different level," Pandey told the court as it asked if UIDAI has the means to know whether the benefit was denied or what is the extent of denials of services based on Aadhaar.

Stressing the entire system for storing the biometric data and demographic information is safe and free from any kind of intrusion, Pandey said that it would "require the age of the universe to crack the data stored in encrypted form".

Fielding questions, largely from Justice Sikri and Justice Chandrachud, Pandey said that people like leprosy patients or others who don't have biometric details would get Aadhaar on the basis of their facial scan or their registered mobile number, which would operate on OTP (One Time Password) system.

Stressing that there was no intrusion in the privacy of Aadhaar users, he said "we are ignorant about the purpose and details of the transactions being undertaken by the people" whose Aadhaar is linked to various services.

Noting that data matching software has been bought from the world's three best companies and stored on UIDAI's 6,000 servers, Pandey said that these are not linked to internet to eliminate possibility of any backdoor access to the data.

Pandey will continue with his presentation on March 27.

Meanwhile, Attorney General K.K. Venugopal told the bench that tremendous efforts by various government agencies and experts had gone into erecting the architecture of Aadhaar at an expenditure of Rs 9,000 crore.

He said 61 committees went into the issue threadbare before the present Aadhaar edifice was put in place, adding all the committees were unanimous on creating a legal framework for unique identity.

Continuing his arguments, the Attorney General on the second day of his submission took the court through the list of the dates starting from March 3, 2006 till 2016 when the law was enacted to demonstrate the exercises undertaken by the present and the previous government.

To this, Justice Sikri said: "These are all dates, right now we are examining the constitutional validity of Aadhaar Act."

As Justice Chandrachud observed "it took you seven years to enact a law", Venugopal said that the legislation was of 2010 and it took time to do ground work.

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (109)/Comments (0)

Kavita Giridhar Mallya

IANS

Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Videos

Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
 
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
 
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest
 
 

Categories

Disclaimer

The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.