Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%

Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
Article rating: No rating
RSS

News

195 income tax cases of companies have systemic issues: CAG

Author: IANS/Saturday, August 5, 2017/Categories: Tax

195 income tax cases of companies have systemic issues: CAG

New Delhi - As many as 195 assessment cases were identified where systemic issues including ambiguities/ lacunae in some provisions of the Income Tax Act were noticed, a Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) report has said.

The performance audit covered cases of scrutiny assessments, appeal and rectification completed during the financial years 2012-13 to 2015-16. Summary assessment records were also checked in respect of the selected cases where scrutiny assessment was not completed till the date of audit. 

"In 22 assessment cases, the income tax department (ITD) did not consider incomes for tax under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) though the same were considered for tax under normal provision. Omission resulted in tax effect of Rs 74.10 crore," the CAG report said.

CAG carried out a performance audit of payment of tax by certain companies during the period from July 2016 to November 2016. The findings of audit were reported to Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on April 10. The report was laid on the floor of Parliament on August 4.

In 16 assessment cases, ITD did not consider the extraordinary/ exceptional items for computation of book profit. Omission resulted in under assessment of income aggregating Rs 126.57 crore involving tax effect of Rs 23.13 crore.
In eight assessment cases, ITD allowed deduction in respect of Debenture Redemption Reserve/Loan Redemption Reserve charged to the 'Appropriation Account' as claimed by assessee in computation of book profit under MAT involving tax effect of Rs 331.14 crore.

ITD on one hand reduced excess depreciation pertaining to earlier years due to change in method of depreciation credited to the profit and loss account in computation of book profit in eight assessment cases. 

On the other hand in six assessment cases, ITD did not add shortfall in depreciation due to change in method of accounting. This involved tax effect of Rs 5.16 crore, it said. 

"Audit came across certain irregularities in computation of brought forward loss and unabsorbed depreciation," the report said.

Several companies that were having large profit from business and distributing substantial portion of the income to their shareholders as dividend, were reducing their tax liability by availing various deductions and exemptions available in the Income Tax Act. 

Such companies referred to as "Zero Tax Companies", were attempted to be brought into tax net by introduction of section 115J by Finance Act 1987. This provision was withdrawn by Finance Act 1990. It was re-introduced as section 115JA by Finance Act, 1996. 

Section 115JA was further revised from 1 April 2001 by introducing a new section 115JB whereby companies had to pay tax on their book profit/ deemed income at a rate prescribed by the government from time to time. 

 

Print Rate this article:
No rating

Number of views (316)/Comments (0)

S Vijaykrishnan
S Vijaykrishnan

IANS

Other posts by IANS
Contact author

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Videos

Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
 
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
 
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above
Want to Invest
 
 

Categories

Disclaimer

The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.