Nifty99000 100%

Sensex99000 100%


Anomalies On Taxation Of Capital Gains

Author: Balwant Jain/Wednesday, January 27, 2021/Categories: Exclusive

Rate this article:
Anomalies On Taxation Of Capital Gains

I wish to give some suggestions to the Union Finance Minister to make the taxation on capital gain more rational by removing some anomalies. Here are my suggestions.

Rebate available under Section 87 A for capital gains
Section 87 A allows a resident individual a tax rebate tax upto Rs12,500, if his total taxable income does not exceed Rs5 lakhs for the year. The income to be considered for this purpose is the final taxable income arrived at after claiming all deductions and exemptions. This rebate is available against all your tax liability of any nature except long-term capital gains on sale or transfer of listed equity shares or equity oriented schemes, on which security transaction tax (STT) has been paid.
Even you can claim this rebate against your tax liability on short-term capital gains from listed equity shares or equity oriented schemes, on which STT has been paid i.e. the same category of assets.
I am unable to understand the strange reasons for such discrimination. In my opinion, it is illogical to allow rebate against short-term capital gains and not against long-term capital gains of the same class of assets. Does the government want people to invest in equity products for short duration, which prudently is not advised?
It is interesting to note that this rebate is available on long-term capital gains on sale of all other assets. Logically, it should be allowed on listed shares and equity units which are otherwise given preferential treatment as regards rate of tax payable on capital gains and holding period requirement for making them long term.

Flat rate on short term capital gains
The short-term capital gains of any nature, referred to as other short-term capital gains, except on listed equity shares and equity schemes are taxed at the slab rate applicable to you. So, in case of a non-resident individual, who is not entitled to claim rebate under Section 87A, and whose income doesn't exceed Rs5 lakhs, is taxed at five per cent on such other short-term capital gains included in such income. However, short-term capital gains on listed equity shares and equity schemes are taxed at a flat rate of 15 per cent even if his total income doesn't exceed the limit of Rs 5 lakhs where the regular slab rate is five per cent. The 15 per cent tax on short-term capital gains is supposed to be a concessional rate of tax but for the taxpayers at the bottom of the slab rates, 15 per cent tax rate on short-term capital gains becomes punitive as against applicable rate of five per cent for other short-term capital gains. This is an anomaly, which needs to be removed by providing that short-term capital gains on equity shall not be taxed at a rate higher than the marginal slab rate applicable to the taxpayer.

Rationalisation of holding period of various capital assets
For the purpose of holding period requirement, the capital assets are dividend in two categories.
Prior to 01-04-1987, a period of 36 months was the holding period for all classes of assets to become long term. Any asset sold before that holding period was treated as short term and taxed accordingly and held for more than 36 months was treated as long term. Later on, the holding period requirement of 36 months was reduced to 12 months for listed equity shares and all the units of mutual funds (MFs). However, the holding period was again changed to 36 months for units other than equity schemes like debt funds/gold funds, etc.
So, as of today, investments in listed securities and equity schemes become long-term after twelve months, but for land and building you have to hold them for 24 months. For an asset like land and building which is normally bought with an intention to hold for longer period, but certainly not 24 months, the requirement of 24 months prescribed also seems illogical to me. Against this requirement of 24 months for land and building the holding period requirement relatively liquid assets like debts schemes, bonds, gold, gold ETF, gold funds, etc., is still 36 months, which on the face of it looks irrational. In my opinion the lower holding period requirement of 24 months for non-financial asset like land and building gives impetus to speculation in these assets instead of channelling genuine and long-term investment in real estate sector. The holding period provisions for other financial products like bonds, debts funds, gold ETF, etc., should be brought down to if not 12 months then at least to 24 months. At the same time, the holding period requirement for all non-financial assets should be raised to if not 60 months then at least to 36 months to make the holding period requirement rational and reasonable based on the nature of the capital asset.
I hope the finance minister is listening.

The writer is a tax and investment expert and can be reached on and @jainbalwant on his twitter handle.


Number of views (280)/Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Add comment



Ask the Finapolis.

I'm not a robot
Dharmendra Satpathy
Col. Sanjeev Govila (retd)
Hum Fauji Investments
The Finapolis' expert answers your queries on investments, taxation and personal finance. Want advice? Submit your Question above



The technical studies / analysis discussed here can be at odds with our fundamental views / analysis. The information and views presented in this report are prepared by Karvy Consultants Limited. The information contained herein is based on our analysis and upon sources that we consider reliable. We, however, do not vouch for the accuracy or the completeness thereof. This material is for personal information and we are not responsible for any loss incurred based upon it. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific investment objectives and financial position and using such independent advice, as they believe necessary. While acting upon any information or analysis mentioned in this report, investors may please note that neither Karvy nor Karvy Consultants nor any person connected with any associate companies of Karvy accepts any liability arising from the use of this information and views mentioned in this document. The author, directors and other employees of Karvy and its affiliates may hold long or short positions in the above mentioned companies from time to time. Every employee of Karvy and its associate companies is required to disclose his/her individual stock holdings and details of trades, if any, that they undertake. The team rendering corporate analysis and investment recommendations are restricted in purchasing/selling of shares or other securities till such a time this recommendation has either been displayed or has been forwarded to clients of Karvy. All employees are further restricted to place orders only through Karvy Consultants Ltd. This report is intended for a restricted audience and we are not soliciting any action based on it. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities, or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities.

Subscribe For Free

Get the e-paper free